Tag: BAT

FCCPC leadership shake-up: Farewell to a Nigerian antitrust legend

Posted on by Editor

AAT is sad (but not surprised) to report that the new Nigerian government under President Bola Tinubu has sacked the legendary head of its competition-law enforcer, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC), Babatunde Irukera. His termination is with immediate effect. His pro tempore replacement at the agency will be Dr. Adamu Ahmed Abdullahi, as the next-in-command Executive Commissioner of Operations.

While it is certainly not a shocking revelation that incoming administrations frequently shake up their senior agency leadership, it is nonetheless an objective loss to the burgeoning FCCPC, which — under Irukera’s leadership — invariably gained international respect and, indeed, won an award for Nigeria’s most effective government institution.

The reactions of those with personal knowledge of the outgoing FCCPC CEO were almost invariably gloomy. Says Andreas Stargard, a partner with competition firm Primerio Ltd.: “This is a real loss to the Commission, which was literally brought into existence under the aegis of Babatunde. The antitrust community views his departure with dejection and a real concern for the future trajectory of the otherwise blossoming young agency, with which we had nothing but positive experiences so far. Babatunde is a real leader, and I wish him well in his future endeavours — I have a feeling that this is not the last we have seen of him in Nigerian antitrust.“

Messrs. Babatunde Irukera (outgoing FCCPC CEO) and Ali Kamanga (COMESA Competition Commission, CCC) at the first IBA competition-law conference in Lagos, Nigeria (photo: A. Stargard, November 2023)

Other industry voices echoed similar sentiments, with academic Vellah Kigwiru opining that Irukera “had so much to offer for the continent,” while the FCCPC’s Chief Legal Officer, Florence Abebe, stated poignantly:

“He is such an icon. FCCPC cannot be the same. The sadness is real. He took the then-CPC from a T-shirt and face cap wearing council with disgruntled incapacitated staff to what it is today on the continent and globally. Staff welfare was paramount, he prioritised capacity development like no other, he demanded excellence and professionalism from staff; he folded his sleeves and did the work, he wasn’t just directing operations, he was handling himself. While we were preparing, this guy was thinking on his feet. He is a genius, unpredictable, humble, compassionate, patient to the core, and didn’t accept failure. He is an institution!”

Mr. Irukera’s departure comes on the heels of the FCCPC’s record-setting multi-million dollar single-firm conduct settlement with British American Tobacco, on which AAT reported previously.

10 January 2023 update:

After widespread criticism and backlash against the manner in which Mr. Irukera’s departure from the Commission was announced by the new(ish) Nigerian government, the administration revised its statements to the effect of having “relieved [him] of his duties,” as opposed to “dismissed” the CEO. From a tweet: “I have followed the concerns in the media on the report that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu dismissed Babatunde Irukera EVC/CEO, Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and Alexander Ayoola Okoh — Director-General/CEO, Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE). The President’s directive did not intend a dismissal. The two men who have served our country were relieved of their duties by the President, as he scouts for their successors. The connotations implied in using the word dismissal were clearly not intended in the statement issued. President Tinubu thanks the two men for their services and wishes them well in their future endeavours.”

Nigeria & Single-Firm Conduct: FCCPC Smokes Monopolist with Largest-Ever Fine

Posted on by Editor

British American Tobacco faces $110 million fine for abuse of dominance in Nigeria, after settlement with up-and-coming antitrust enforcement agency

By Nicola Taljaard and Nicole Araujo 

About three years ago, in the summer of 2020, British American Tobacco Nigeria Limited and associated companies (collectively “BAT”) became the subject of an investigation by Nigeria’s then-brand-new Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (“FCCPC”). The FCCPC was looking into the potential violation of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (“FCCPA”) and Administrative Penalties Regulations, 2020 (“Regulations”). After three years of investigating BAT’s business practices (including “dawn raids” on the company’s various office locations), the FCCPC found BAT guilty of having engaged in unfair business practices under section 155 of the Act by abusing its market dominance in Nigeria and violating public health regulations.  For the former, notably, BAT had penalized retailers for fostering an equitable and competitive market for its rival’s products in-store.

As a result of the finding, the FCCPC and BAT entered a consent order in December 2023. As part of this settlement pact, BAT agreed to engage in tobacco health advocacy, provide written assurances to the FCCPC and to be monitored by the FCCPC for the ensuing two years to ensure that BAT modified its behavioral and business practices to accord with relevant antitrust and tobacco control laws and efforts. BAT also agreed to pay a hefty fine of $110 million to the FCCPC in accordance with Clause 11 of the Regulations.  Notes Andreas Stargard, competition partner at specialist firm Primerio Ltd., “[t]he penalty agreed upon by the parties constitutes the largest fine imposed by the FCCPC thus far. It is also the first known instance in which the Regulations — which were intended to clarify the methodology for calculating administrative penalties — were applied and where the FCCPC has used the discretion conferred on it under Clause 11 to ‘consider administrative penalties on a case-by-case basis as the circumstances require’. Notably, BAT cannot appeal this fine, as it is part of a mutually agreed ‘consent order’ between the parties.”

In accordance with the terms and nature of the consent agreement, respectively, the FCCPCwithdrew the pending criminal charges against BAT and the agreement is not subject to appeal. Moreover, in compliance with applicable legislation, BAT and the relevant associated companies must advocate for both tobacco control and public health. 

The investigation and consent agreement have certainly come at a precarious time for BAT, which recently published that the value of its cigarette brands had diminished considerably in the past year and is known to have entered into a separate agreement with the US authorities surrounding investigations into the violation of a prohibition on tobacco sales to North Korea. 

The fine agreed to between the FCCPC and BAT follows the fairly recent publication of the FCCPC’s Regulations which delineate the legislative framework for the administration and imposition of administrative penalties according to the Act. The FCCPC reiterated its commitment to enforcing the law, making sure companies follow the relevant regulations, fair markets are fostered by all, and the protection of consumer interests are at the core of competitive actions and regulations. Ultimately, a fine to this extent sends a clear signal to other companies about the importance of fair, competitive behaviour and antitrust compliance.